elprofe
All Star
EE= 2008 State Football Champs!
Posts: 244
|
Post by elprofe on Aug 12, 2008 0:04:44 GMT -6
Big Games like that always are pretty close till the 4th when one pulls away for a double digit win. I still think it is going to be back and forth till late in the 4th. Curious? No disrespect intended, but what happened to the Cards last year? I saw them versus PSJA and I didn't see much depth...it seems that Harlingen was very one dimensional and played most of the game on the ground. Wasn't a very good outcome to say the least. What changed besides the coach? |
|
|
|
Post by thered on Aug 12, 2008 0:09:57 GMT -6
the stadium has changed also...its renovated and looks a lil different
|
|
|
|
Post by redbird on Aug 12, 2008 0:14:29 GMT -6
The OC didn't work with the QB's on their passing and never wanted to pass. It was a lot of QB draws. It was pathetic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ol' Buzzard on Aug 12, 2008 0:22:31 GMT -6
The OC didn't work with the QB's on their passing and never wanted to pass. It was a lot of QB draws. It was pathetic. In that instance, I could see how it affected the 7 on 7 team... |
|
|
|
Post by FootballGal on Aug 12, 2008 8:11:58 GMT -6
I don't have time to look it up; who does EE play first Harlingen or PI?
|
|
|
|
Post by thered on Aug 12, 2008 8:13:00 GMT -6
EE plays Calallen first then Harlingen.
|
|
|
|
Post by cardinalcountry on Aug 12, 2008 9:15:49 GMT -6
the only thing about 7 on 7, is their is no pass rush, i believe that will be harlingens strenght this season. if doesn't EE does get a running game going and just passes all night, EE will be playing into harl. hands. it will be a very physical game. for all i know EE will be the best team harl. play's, just because it's 5A vs. 4A doesn't mean anything to me, it will be 11 on offense vs. 11 on defense that friday night. good luck 2 both teams
|
|
|
|
Post by redbird on Aug 12, 2008 9:22:55 GMT -6
You are absolutely right. EE just might be the best team Harlingen plays this season. It is going to be electric that night. Big time crowd for a big time game.
|
|
|
|
Post by jacket4life on Aug 12, 2008 9:37:39 GMT -6
the only thing about 7 on 7, is their is no pass rush, i believe that will be harlingens strenght this season. if doesn't EE does get a running game going and just passes all night, EE will be playing into harl. hands. it will be a very physical game. for all i know EE will be the best team harl. play's, just because it's 5A vs. 4A doesn't mean anything to me, it will be 11 on offense vs. 11 on defense that friday night. good luck 2 both teams +1 |
|
|
|
Post by sweetninjas on Aug 12, 2008 10:30:21 GMT -6
A couple. They also just weren't very good. lol. I don't know why. I still think it has to do with how crappy our oc had been the last couple of years. Damn. It is embarrassing just thinking about it. Why couldn't sweetninja admit that... he was quick to make excuse and what not. (the fighting). The OC has nothing to do with 7 on 7... The team should have had their own non-staff coach. If they had problems with their technique, it wouldn't be the OC... doesn't he just call the plays?[/quot Admit what? I never said HRL's 7 on 7 was good. The only thing I said was that 7 on 7 does NOT mean a thing. Trust me the talent was there, just not the mentality like others inculding EE. Our QB Murphy gave a great speech to the kids, letting them know that 7 on 7 doesnt mean jack and the only reason were doing this is so that we can work on the things we need to work on (route running, passing) He also pointed out that most teams will run unconventional BS that would never work in a game. I saw this first hand In La Villa, Mercedes, and I've seen video of EE doing it as well. The focus for HRL's 7 on 7 was for practice, not winning. As for the fighting I never made an excuse it was unacceptable and should of never happenned. Our players need to show more control in situations like that. |
|
|
|
Post by sweetninjas on Aug 12, 2008 10:34:42 GMT -6
A couple. They also just weren't very good. lol. I don't know why. I still think it has to do with how crappy our oc had been the last couple of years. Damn. It is embarrassing just thinking about it. It had nothing to do with the OC, the new offense was being run. Redbird if would see the formations teams run in 7 on 7, you would understand were Im coming from. |
|
amnova
Heisman Winner
Posts: 895
|
Post by amnova on Aug 12, 2008 12:04:17 GMT -6
if doesn't EE does get a running game going and just passes all night, EE will be playing into harl. hands. Nino had a very good 7on7 season, but imo if a question has to be placed some where it has to be on him. Not to say he isn't good but Roger Garcia will have the running game set. p.s aksdfakdsfkj ;D |
|
|
|
Post by redbird on Aug 12, 2008 12:27:03 GMT -6
A couple. They also just weren't very good. lol. I don't know why. I still think it has to do with how crappy our oc had been the last couple of years. Damn. It is embarrassing just thinking about it. It had nothing to do with the OC, the new offense was being run. Redbird if would see the formations teams run in 7 on 7, you would understand were Im coming from. I totally agree with you ninjas. I haven't seen them because I agree with you. 7 on 7 is for practice purposes and I don't go watch it. What formations are you talking about? Do they run formations that they would never run during a game? |
|
|
|
Post by sweetninjas on Aug 12, 2008 13:20:35 GMT -6
It had nothing to do with the OC, the new offense was being run. Redbird if would see the formations teams run in 7 on 7, you would understand were Im coming from. I totally agree with you ninjas. I haven't seen them because I agree with you. 7 on 7 is for practice purposes and I don't go watch it. What formations are you talking about? Do they run formations that they would never run during a game? Yes. |
|
|
|
Post by Ol' Buzzard on Aug 12, 2008 14:26:27 GMT -6
A couple. They also just weren't very good. lol. I don't know why. I still think it has to do with how crappy our oc had been the last couple of years. Damn. It is embarrassing just thinking about it. Why couldn't sweetninja admit that... he was quick to make excuse and what not. (the fighting). The OC has nothing to do with 7 on 7... The team should have had their own non-staff coach. If they had problems with their technique, it wouldn't be the OC... doesn't he just call the plays?[/quot Admit what? I never said HRL's 7 on 7 was good. The only thing I said was that 7 on 7 does NOT mean a thing. Trust me the talent was there, just not the mentality like others inculding EE. Our QB Murphy gave a great speech to the kids, letting them know that 7 on 7 doesnt mean jack and the only reason were doing this is so that we can work on the things we need to work on (route running, passing) He also pointed out that most teams will run unconventional BS that would never work in a game. I saw this first hand In La Villa, Mercedes, and I've seen video of EE doing it as well. The focus for HRL's 7 on 7 was for practice, not winning. As for the fighting I never made an excuse it was unacceptable and should of never happenned. Our players need to show more control in situations like that. "[It's] was for practice, not winning" Good post... I think that is what losers say... What's next... are you going to say the played 7 on 7 for fun, not winning?  |
|
|
|
Post by cardinalcountry on Aug 12, 2008 14:49:25 GMT -6
i think every schools different, harlingens never really made 7 on 7 real important, but they always seemed to have a good offense(except the last 2 years). so all i know is if you got good player's on the offensive line, running the ball to set up the pass, keeping the defense on its heels. you cant really do that in 7 on 7.
|
|
|
|
Post by redbird on Aug 12, 2008 15:20:50 GMT -6
Relax there buzz. If EE puts an emphasis on it then so be it. That is good. I am sure it helps with the confidence and offense. Look, I don't know much about the 7 on 7 except from what peeps tell me. Why would you run formations that have nothing to do with what you run during the season?? That makes no sense to me. What makes sense is to work on the things they need to work on...the route running and the passing, etc. Now that makes sense.
The same thing goes for a scrimmage. You play it to work out who your players are and what combos work....etc. They don't mean jack either when it comes to winning and losing. If you win...great. If not...well, did you work on what you needed to work on? Does EE go all out to win a scrimmage? Look, I don't want to get involved in this arguement between you and ninjas...just thought I would throw in my two cents and leave it at that.
|
|
|
|
Post by sweetninjas on Aug 12, 2008 17:08:27 GMT -6
Why couldn't sweetninja admit that... he was quick to make excuse and what not. (the fighting). The OC has nothing to do with 7 on 7... The team should have had their own non-staff coach. If they had problems with their technique, it wouldn't be the OC... doesn't he just call the plays?[/quot Admit what? I never said HRL's 7 on 7 was good. The only thing I said was that 7 on 7 does NOT mean a thing. Trust me the talent was there, just not the mentality like others inculding EE. Our QB Murphy gave a great speech to the kids, letting them know that 7 on 7 doesnt mean jack and the only reason were doing this is so that we can work on the things we need to work on (route running, passing) He also pointed out that most teams will run unconventional BS that would never work in a game. I saw this first hand In La Villa, Mercedes, and I've seen video of EE doing it as well. The focus for HRL's 7 on 7 was for practice, not winning. As for the fighting I never made an excuse it was unacceptable and should of never happenned. Our players need to show more control in situations like that. "[It's] was for practice, not winning" Good post... I think that is what losers say... What's next... are you going to say the played 7 on 7 for fun, not winning? Actually I think the real loser would be you and how you made 7 on 7 more than what it was. I'm sorry to say that our kids mentalities were far more greater than EE's or at least yours. Isn't football supposed to be fun? |
|
|
|
Post by sweetninjas on Aug 12, 2008 17:15:13 GMT -6
Relax there buzz. If EE puts an emphasis on it then so be it. That is good. I am sure it helps with the confidence and offense. Look, I don't know much about the 7 on 7 except from what peeps tell me. Why would you run formations that have nothing to do with what you run during the season?? That makes no sense to me. What makes sense is to work on the things they need to work on...the route running and the passing, etc. Now that makes sense. The same thing goes for a scrimmage. You play it to work out who your players are and what combos work....etc. They don't mean jack either when it comes to winning and losing. If you win...great. If not...well, did you work on what you needed to work on? Does EE go all out to win a scrimmage? Look, I don't want to get involved in this arguement between you and ninjas...just thought I would throw in my two cents and leave it at that. Exactly. +100 |
|
|
|
Post by cardinalcountry on Aug 12, 2008 17:21:36 GMT -6
any news on the cardinal pratices, or site of PI scrimmage, i real do think its at boggus, they been cleaning the stadium as if theirs going to be a game.
|
|
